ArticleJournal of anatomy1996
Does the nerve supply to both the superficial and deep surfaces of pectoralis major imply two separate developmental origins?
Article in Journal of anatomy, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging patterns of mononeuropathic denervation in muscles with dual innervation.Skeletal radiology · 2017Review
- Bilateral Chondroepitrochlearis Muscle: Case Report, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Clinical Significance.Anatomy research international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nature of the nerve supply to the "pocket' of pectoralis major was examined on 7 randomly selected sides of 5 embalmed cadavers. The pocket was a U-shaped muscular fold, opening cranially. The anterior limb and inner surface of the fold were supplied by nerve branches that originated from the middle segment of the pectoral nerve loop and penetrated pectoralis minor. The outer surface of the posterior limb was supplied by one or two branches that extended from the caudal segment of the pectoral nerve loop. If the muscular U-shaped fold is unfolded, it becomes obvious that the posterior wall of the pocket forms the most caudal part of pectoralis major and is supplied from both the superficial (anterior) and deep (posterior) surfaces. This dual surface supply does not suggest any aspect of the developmental origin of the pocket but may simply be due to the relative positions of the pectoralis major and its nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8621324PMC1167561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.