Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8617209›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal1996

Conserved function of anopheles gambiae midgut-specific promoters in the fruitfly.

G Skavdis, I Sidén-Kiamos, H M Müller, A Crisanti, C Louis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Invertebrate trypsins: a review.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2008
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Robust gut-specific gene expression in transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G SkavdisInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
I Sidén-Kiamos
H M Müller
A Crisanti
C Louis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of malaria by a methodology that would permit the effective blockage of the Anopheles gambiae midgut wall penetration by Plasmodium parasites requires a detailed understanding of both the physiology of the mosquito's digestion, and of the interactions between the parasite and its host. We have transformed Drosophila melanogaster with several constructs that allow the study of the promoter region of two of the major late trypsin genes of A. gambiae. Using several deletions, we have identified, for both genes, small genomic segments that are sufficient to confer tissue specificity to the promoter in a species that is far away in evolution from the mosquito. This will allow further studies that will enable both the understanding of the blood meal digestion, and may potentially be useful for the design of anti-plasmodial constructs at a later stage.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnophelesBase SequenceConserved SequenceDigestive SystemDigestive System Physiological PhenomenaDrosophila melanogasterGenes, InsectIsoenzymesLac OperonMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPlasmidsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsIsoenzymesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTrypsin

Identifiers

PMID8617209
PMCPMC449949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.