Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8612595›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal1996

A preference of histone H1 for methylated DNA.

M McArthur, J O Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatial heterogeneity of dynamics of H1 linker histone.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2014
    Article
  6. What controls nucleosome positions?Trends in genetics : TIG · 2009
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic imprinting: a chromatin connection.American journal of human genetics · 1997
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M McArthurCambridge Center for Molecular Recognition, University of Cambridge, UK.
J O Thomas

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have identified a clear preference of histone H1 for CpG-methylated DNA, irrespective of DNA sequence. The conditions under which this preference is observed allowed cooperative binding of H1; the H1-DNA complexes formed were shown earlier to be 'tramlines' of two DNA duplexes bridged by an array of H1 molecules, and multiples of these. The preference for methylated DNA is clear in sedimentation assays, which also show that the preference is greater with increased methylation level, and in gel retardation assays with an oligonucleotide containing a single methyl-CpG pair; it is shared by the globular domain which also binds cooperatively to DNA. A small intrinsic preference of H1 for methylated DNA is also apparent in Southwestern assays where the immobilized H1 presumably cannot bind cooperatively. Methylated DNA in H1-DNA complexes was partially protected (relative to unmethylated DNA) against digestion by MspI but not by enzymes whose cutting sites were not methylated, consistent with a direct interaction of H1 with methylated nucleotides; this was also true of GH1-DNA complexes. H1 variants (spH1 and H5) from transcriptionally repressed nuclei have a stronger preference than H1 for methylated DNA, suggesting that this may be relevant to the stabilization of chromatin higher order structure and transcriptional repression.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesChickensChromatinCpG IslandsDNAHistonesIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMethylationMolecular Sequence DataMolecular StructureProtein BindingRatsSea UrchinsChromatinDNAHistones

Identifiers

PMID8612595
PMCPMC450082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.