Inclusion body myositis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Chaperones and the Proteasome System: Regulating the Construction and Demolition of Striated Muscle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
   Review
2. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009
   Article
3. Inflammatory Myopathy.Current treatment options in neurology · 1999
   Article
4. Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced cardiac and skeletal muscle disease.Journal of virology · 1996
   Article
5. Investigation of muscle disease.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1996
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as