ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology1996
Stage-specific gene expression during hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat.
Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid inhibit proliferation in transformed rat hepatic oval cells.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Single-walled carbon nanotube-induced mitotic disruption.Mutation research · 2012Article
- Article
- Regulation of p53 by protein kinase C during multi-stage carcinogenesis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 1997Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The alteration of genetic expression ubiquitously seen in both preneoplastic and neoplastic tissues has been investigated for many years in the hope that the critical molecular changes resulting in cancer can be elucidated. The alteration of the expression of specific genes has already been employed in diagnostic and even screening procedures for this disease. In the past many observations of such alterations have led to a variety of theories but not definitive generalizations. Studies of the alteration of genetic expression may now be viewed in the light of our understanding of the multistage nature of neoplastic development. This brief review describes a number of genes the expressions of which are altered during the stages of initiation and promotion, in contrast to the alteration of expression of genes during the stage of progression. The promotion stage is concerned primarily with the chronic interaction of promoting agents in the environment with the genetic apparatus of the cell, played out on the altered genetic background resulting from the stage of initiation. In contrast, the progression stage is characterized primarily by an evolving karyotypic instability resulting in continual genetic changes during this stage. On the basis of these distinctions it is possible to identify genes the altered expression of which is unique to the stage of progression. The identification of these genes and an understanding of mechanisms resulting in their altered expression will allow not only a better molecular characterization of the progression stage but also the quantitative analysis of neoplastic development in several model animal systems as well as eventually in the human.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.