Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8606362›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology1995

Amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in confluent M-1 mouse cortical collecting duct cells.

B Letz, A Ackermann, C M Canessa, B C Rossier, C Korbmacher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plasmin in nephrotic urine activates the epithelial sodium channel.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2009
    Article
  5. Cell models for studying renal physiology.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2008
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B LetzZentrum der Physiologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
A Ackermann
C M Canessa
B C Rossier
C Korbmacher
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confluent M-1 cells show electrogenic Na+ absorption and possess an amiloride-sensitive Na(+)-conductance (Korbmacher et al., J. Gen. Physiol. 102:761-793, 1993). In the present study, we further characterized this conductance and identified the underlying single channels using conventional patch clamp technique. Moreover, we isolated poly(A)+ RNA from M-1 cells to express the channels in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and to check for the presence of transcripts related to the epithelial Na+ channel recently cloned from rat colon (Canessa et al., Nature 361:467-470, 1993). Patch clamp experiments were performed in 6-13-day-old confluent M-1 cells at 37 degrees C. In whole-cell experiments application of 10(-5) M amiloride caused a hyperpolarization of 24.9, SEM +/- 2.2 mV (n = 35) and a reduction of the inward current by 107 +/- 10 pA (n = 51) at a holding potential of -60 mV. Complete removal of bath Na+ had similar effects, indicating that the amiloride-sensitive component of the inward current is a Na+ current. The effect of amiloride was concentration-dependent with half-inhibition at 0.22 microM. The Na+ current saturated with increasing extracellular Na+ concentrations with an apparent Km of 24 mM. Na+ replacement for Li+ demonstrated a higher apical membrane conductance for Li+ than for Na+. In excised inside-out (i/o) or outside-out (o/o) patches from the apical membrane, we observed single-channels which showed slow kinetics and were reversibly inhibited by amiloride. Their average conductance for Na+ was 6.8 +/- 0.5 pS (n = 15) and for Li+ 11.2 +/- 1.0 pS (n = 14). They had no measurable conductance for K+. In o/o patches, channel activity was slightly voltage dependent with an open probability (NPo) of 0.46 +/- 0.14 and 0.16 +/- 0.05 at a holding potential of -100 and 0 mV, respectively (n = 8, P < 0.05). Using the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique, we assayed defolliculated stage V-VI Xenopus oocytes for an amiloride-sensitive inward current 1-6 days after injection with H2O or with 20-50 ng of M-1 poly(A)+ RNA. In poly(A)+ RNA-injected oocytes held at -60 or -100 mV application of amiloride (2 microM) reduced the Na-inward current by 25.5 +/- 4.6 nA (n = 25) while it had no effect in H2O-injected oocytes (n = 19). Northern blot analysis of M-1 poly(A+) RNA revealed the presence of transcripts related to the three known subunits of the rat colon Na+ channel (Canessa et al., Nature 367:463-467, 1994). We conclude that the channel in M-1 cells is closely related to the amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel in the rat colon and that the M-1 cell line provides a useful tool to investigate the biophysical and molecular properties of the corresponding channel in the cortical collecting duct.

Indexed as

AmilorideAnimalsBlotting, NorthernCell LineElectric ConductivityKidney CortexKidney Tubules, CollectingMiceOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRecombinant ProteinsSodiumSodium ChannelsXenopusAmilorideRecombinant ProteinsSodiumSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID8606362
OpenAlexW2059560738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.