Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8601477›Full record

ArticleGenetics1995

Ribosomal DNA evolution at the population level: nucleotide variation in intergenic spacer arrays of Daphnia pulex.

T J Crease

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure and organization of the rDNA intergenic spacer in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2000
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T J CreaseDepartment of Zoology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. tcrease@uoguelph.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide variation was surveyed in 21 subrepeat arrays from the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer of three Daphnia pulex populations. Eighteen of these arrays contained four subrepeats. Contrary to expectations, each of the four positions within the array had a different consensus sequence. However, gene conversion, involving sequences less than the length of a subrepeat, had occurred between subrepeats in different positions. Three arrays had more than four subrepeats and were undoubtedly generated by unequal crossing over between standard-length arrays. The data strongly suggested that most unequal exchanges between arrays are intrachromosomal and that they occur much less frequently than unequal exchanges at the level of the entire rDNA repeat. Strong associations among variants at different positions allowed the recognition of five groups of arrays, two of which were found in more than one population. Five of the seven individuals surveyed had arrays from more than one group. Analysis of the distribution of nucleotide variation suggested that the populations were quite divergent, a result that is concordant with previous surveys of allozyme and mitochondrial DNA variation. It was suggested that some of the subrepeat array types are quite old, at least predating the recolonization of pond habitats in the midwestern United States after the last glaciation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBase SequenceConsensus SequenceDaphniaDNA, RibosomalGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID8601477
PMCPMC1206870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.