Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8601368›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences1996

Mucus production of choledochal epithelial cells due to bile stagnation in the rat.

K Kurumado, T Nagai, H Abe

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K KurumadoDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Mizonikuchi, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kanagawa-Ken, Japan.
T Nagai
H Abe
Teikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucus secretion is increased by various causative agents of inflammation in the mucosa. Although mucus production of the choledochal epithelial cells (except goblet cells) has never been noted in the rat in normal physiological conditions, it is seen as an inflammatory reaction in animals with choledochoenterostomy, which brings bacteria and active digestive enzymes into the common bile duct through regurgitation of intestinal contents. It is known that stagnant bile alone can cause inflammation in the mucosa of the gallbladder in patients with aseptic acalculous cholecystitis. In this study, aseptic bile stagnation was caused by choledochal dilation made by detaching the common bile duct from the hepatoduodenal ligament in five rats, and histological changes of the choledochal epithelium were observed by light and transmission electron microscopy 17 months after the operative procedure to determine whether stagnant bile could cause mucus production in choledochal epithelial cells. Mucus production was noted in two rats by light microscopy and in all the rats by transmission electron microscopy, and so it was demonstrated that stagnant bile could give rise to this phenomenon in the rat choledochal epithelium.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaCommon Bile DuctMaleMicroscopy, ElectronMucusRatsRats, WistarStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID8601368
OpenAlexW1988469146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.