Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8601050›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging1995

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Potential effects in older patients.

G Gardner, D E Furst

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G GardnerDivision of Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
D E Furst
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are frequently used in rheumatoid arthritis. A number of physiological changes occur in the elderly which may modify the use of these medications. The most commonly used DMARDs are antimalarial drugs (particularly hydroxychloroquine), sulfasalazine and methotrexate. The principal mechanism of action of the antimalarials relates to the fact that they change intracellular pH, which downregulates numerous immune functions. Hydroxychloroquine is metabolised to 3 metabolites and has a very low clearance. It is moderately effective in dosages up to 6.4 mg/kg/day. While it is not the most effective of the DMARDs, it is the least toxic. Sulfasalazine is a prodrug which is enzymatically split in the bowel to form sulfapyridine (the principal active metabolite) and 5-aminosalicylic acid. The metabolism of sulfasalazine is complex and, to some extent, genetically determined. The mechanism of action of the drug is not well understood, but involves decreased production of cytokines and decreased proliferative response of lymphocytes. It may slow the rate of bony damage associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Nearly 50% of the patients who are prescribed sulfasalazine continue to receive the drug for up to 4 years. Sulfasalazine is not as well tolerated as hydroxychloroquine. Gastrointestinal toxicity, in particular, seems to be a problem in elderly patients taking this medication. Methotrexate is presently the most popular of the DMARDs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Methotrexate inhibits dihydrofolate reductase and adenosine release and has a secondary effect on cytokines and polymorphonuclear chemotaxis. It is highly metabolised within cells and remains there for prolonged periods. Up to 70% of patients who are prescribed methotrexate continue treatment for 5 years. Methotrexate treatment is associated with gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous and, possibly, pulmonary adverse effects. The use of azathioprine, penicillamine and gold compounds is briefly reviewed in this article. Elderly patients have an increased incidence of rashes when using penicillamine, relative to young patients. There are no age-related differences in the efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine or gold therapy. The poor absorption and renal toxicity associated with cyclosporin, the new 'salvage' therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, make it generally unsuitable for use in the elderly, except under specialists' supervision.

Indexed as

AgedAgingAntimalarialsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidHumansMethotrexateSulfasalazineAntimalarialsAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexateSulfasalazine

Identifiers

PMID8601050
OpenAlexW2041193586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.