Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8599859›Full record

ReviewCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology1996

Promising new agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

M J Edelman, D R Gandara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oncolytic viral therapies.Cancer gene therapy · 2004
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Selectively replicating viral vectors.Cancer gene therapy · 2002
    Review
  10. Anti-tumor efficacy of paclitaxel against human lung cancer xenografts.Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J EdelmanDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Davis, USA.
D R Gandara
VA Northern California Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of new drugs and drug classes have recently become available for clinical testing which demonstrate significant antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer. The preclinical rationale, mechanism of action, toxicity profile and results of early trials of paclitaxel, docetaxel, edatrexate, CPT-11, topotecan, vinorelbine and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer are reviewed.

Indexed as

TaxoidsAminopterinAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials as TopicDeoxycytidineDocetaxelGemcitabineHumansLung NeoplasmsPaclitaxelVinblastineVinorelbineAminopterinAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinDeoxycytidineDocetaxeledatrexateGemcitabinePaclitaxelTaxoidsVinblastineVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID8599859
OpenAlexW2020691687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.