ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease1995
DNA diagnosis of pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency in female patients with congenital lactic acidaemia.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
- The spectrum of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency: clinical, biochemical and genetic features in 371 patients.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2012Article
- The spectrum of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency: clinical, biochemical and genetic features in 371 patients.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2012Review
- Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency: identification of a novel mutation in the PDHA1 gene which responds to amino acid supplementation.European journal of pediatrics · 2009Article
- A Korean female patient with thiamine-responsive pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency due to a novel point mutation (Y161C)in the PDHA1 gene.Journal of Korean medical science · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) E1 alpha deficiency, which is an X-linked inborn error of metabolism, is usually established by the measurement of PDH complex activity in cultured cells. However, heterozygous female patients with PDH E1 alpha deficiency may be misdiagnosed when the normal X chromosome is predominantly expressed in the cultured cells. Therefore, in female patients with convincing clinical presentations of PDH E1 alpha deficiency and the normal enzyme activity, the X-inactivation pattern should be analysed and the PDH E1 alpha gene screened for mutations. For this screening, we applied the method of single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and DNA sequencing and examined 11 female patients with congenital lactic acidaemia whose PDH complex activity was normal in cultured cells. In 2 of the 11 female patients, we found distinct pathogenic missense mutations in the PDH E1 alpha gene (G89S and G291R). Both affected patients showed a similar clinical presentation and had been diagnosed as West syndrome. In 3 of the 11 patients, we found a polymorphic base-pair substitution in exon 9 of the PDH E1 alpha gene which resulted in a changed amino acid residue (M282L). We conclude that PCR-SSCP analysis of the PDH E1 alpha gene, followed by DNA sequencing, is a useful method to screen for mutations of the PDH E1 alpha gene in female patients with congenital lactic acidaemia who have normal enzyme activities in available samples, normal ratio of lactate to pyruvate, and predominantly raised lactate concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.