Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8597551›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology1995

Transmission of the effect of an antifungal agent within a single hypha.

K B Oh, H Matsuoka, W Jing, A Yamamoto, H Kurata

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K B OhDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
H Matsuoka
W Jing
A Yamamoto
H Kurata
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A micro-compartment culture method was devised in which a single hypha of Rhizopus stolonifer growing on an agar section traversed an antifungal non-diffusible barrier to another agar section; thus the local environment of the distal or proximal part of the hypha could be controlled independently. The responses in terms of hyphal extension of the test fungus to local application of amphotericin B in this culture system were estimated by using an automatic analysing system. After hyphae had traversed the barrier, distal application of amphotericin B caused no appreciable effect on the proximal hyphae. In contrast, proximal application of amphotericin B caused inhibition of the extension of distal hyphae. The reversal of polarized cytoplasmic streaming also occurred during the inhibition of distal hyphal extension. The extents of inhibition of the distal hyphal extension and the cytoplasmic streaming were dependent upon the hyphal distance between the amphotericin B application site and the hyphal tip. These results show that the effect of an antifungal agent on a hypha depends on the region of the hypha exposed. Cytoplasmic streaming may play key role in the transmission of antifungal effects within a single hypha.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCell Culture TechniquesCell PolarityCytoplasmic StreamingRhizopusAmphotericin BAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID8597551
OpenAlexW2053461829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.