Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8595677›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics1996

Wild chromosomal variants in Aspergillus nidulans.

D M Geiser, M L Arnold, W E Timberlake

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. B-chromosome evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2000
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D M GeiserDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
M L Arnold
W E Timberlake
University of Georgia · USMycovia Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS GM37886PHS HHS A107373-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and a chromosome-specific cosmid DNA library were used to determine the karyotypes of wild-type Aspergillus nidulans isolates from around the world. Overall, little structural variation was found, with a few major exceptions. One isolate possessed a non-essential B-chromosome of about 1.0 million base pairs (mb). Another isolate had undergone a non-reciprocal translocation of about 1.6 mb of chromosome VI onto chromosome VIII. Other than these chromosomal differences, these isolates appeared phenotypically normal. To analyze its effects on meiosis, the translocation isolate was outcrossed with another wild-type derivative that had a normal electrophoretic karyotype. This cross produced a range of phenotypes, including duplicated progeny that had a barren phenotype similar to that described for Neurospora partial disomics. The duplication was somewhat vegetatively unstable. This is the first association of sterility with chromosomal duplication in A. nidulans.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAspergillus nidulansChromosome MappingChromosomes, FungalCosmidsCrosses, GeneticGenes, FungalKaryotypingMeiosisPhenotypeTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID8595677
OpenAlexW1510301309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.