Sustaining general practice.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [The stable patient collective as a potential pitfall of prospective primary health-care studies. A qualitative inquiry among general practitioners].Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983) · 2009
   Article
2. Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.Postgraduate medical journal · 2002
   Article
3. Tensions between policy makers and general practitioners in implementing new genetics: grounded theory interview study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
   Review
4. Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in the UK: what are the problems and solutions?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
   Review
5. General practitioner turnover and migration in England 1990-94.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
   Article
6. 'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
   Article
7. Putting principals back into practice: an evaluation of a re-entry course for vocationally trained doctors.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
   Article
8. General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as