Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8594601›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1996

Improvements to the GDB Human Genome Data Base.

K H Fasman, S I Letovsky, R W Cottingham, D T Kingsbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GDB: the Human Genome Database.Nucleic acids research · 1998
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sequence mapping by electronic PCRGenome research · 1997
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Radiation Hybrid Database.Nucleic acids research · 1997
    Article
  12. The GDB Human Genome Database Anno 1997.Nucleic acids research · 1997
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Organization of heterogeneous scientific data using the EAV/CR representation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K H FasmanDivision of Biomedical Information Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
S I Letovsky
R W Cottingham
D T Kingsbury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Version 6.0 of the Human Genome Data Base introduces a number of significant improvements over previous releases of GDB. The most important of these are revised data representations for genes and genomic maps and a new curatorial model for the database. GDB 6.0 is the first major genomic database to provide read/write access directly to the scientific community, including capabilities for third-party annotation. The revised database can represent all major categories of genetic and physical maps, along with the underlying order and distance information used to construct them. The improved representation permits more sophisticated map queries to be posed and supports the graphical display of maps. In addition the new GDB has a richer model for gene information, better suited for supporting cross-references to databases describing gene function, structure, products, expression and associated phenotypes.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualGenome, HumanAnimalsComputer Communication NetworksComputer GraphicsHumansMicePolymorphism, GeneticUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID8594601
PMCPMC145602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.