ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry1995
Structures of small subunit ribosomal RNAs in situ from Escherichia coli and Thermomyces lanuginosus.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small ribosomal subunits from the prokaryote Escherichia coli and the eukaryote Thermomyces lanuginosus were imaged electron spectroscopically, and single particle analysis used to yield three-dimensional reconstructions of the net phosphorus distribution representing the nucleic acid (RNA) backbone. This direct approach showed both ribosomal RNAs to have a three domain structure and other characteristic morphological features. The eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit had a prominent bill present in the head domain, while the prokaryotic subunit had a small vestigial bill. Both ribosomal subunits contained a thick 'collar' central domain which correlates to the site of the evolutionarily conserved ribosomal RNA core, and the location of the majority of ribosomal RNA bases that have been implicated in translation. The reconstruction of the prokaryotic subunit had a prominent protrusion extending from the collar, forming a channel approximately 1.5 nm wide and potentially representing a 'bridge' to the large subunit in the intact monosome. The basal domain of the prokaryotic ribosomal subunit was protein free. In this region of the eukaryotic subunit, there were two basal lobes composed of ribosomal RNA, consistent with previous hypotheses that this is a site for the 'non-conserved core' ribosomal RNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.