ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
A comparison of the effects of exogenous and endogenous prostaglandins on fast and slow contractions of field-stimulated guinea-pig vas deferens.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulation of smooth muscle contractility by the epithelium in rat vas deferens: role of ATP-induced release of PGE2.The Journal of physiology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. This study has compared the effects of exogenous and endogenous prostaglandins on the two phases of contraction of the guinea-pig vas deferens produced by electrical field stimulation. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), sulprostone and arachidonic acid dose-dependently and completely inhibited the first (fast) phase of contraction, with IC50s of 2.6 nM, 0.65 nM and 2.2 microM, respectively. 2. Following desensitization of the receptor for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) with alpha, beta-methylene ATP, PGE2, sulprostone and arachidonic acid dose-dependently inhibited the second (slow) phase of contraction of the guinea-pig vas deferens produced by electrical field stimulation, but the inhibition was incomplete (up to only 30%). Indomethacin (2.8 microM) reduced the effect of arachidonic acid. On its own, indomethacin (0.3 to 6.0 microM) had no consistent effect although, on some tissues, a slight potentiation of the contractions was seen. 3. Cicaprost (a PGI2 analogue) at low concentrations (0.5 to 30 nM) potentiated the first phase of contraction but even at high concentrations, had no consistent effect on the second phase of contraction of the guinea-pig vas deferens produced by electrical field stimulation. 4. PGE2, sulprostone and cicaprost potentiated contractions of the guinea-pig vas deferens produced by exogenous ATP. PGE2 and sulprostone also potentiated contractions produced by exogenous noradrenaline, whereas cicaprost had no consistent effect on the response to noradrenaline. 5. These findings indicate that prostaglandins of the E-series inhibit the second phase of contraction as well as the first phase of contraction of the guinea-pig vas deferens produced by electrical field stimulation. However, the extent of the inhibition is much less for the second phase than for the first phase. The reasons for this differential action of PGE are not clear. 6. Cicaprost potentiates the first phase but not the second phase of contraction. Since cicaprost potentiates the contractions produced by exogenous ATP, but not by exogenous noradrenaline, by an action presumably on post-junctional IP receptors, the potentiating action of cicaprost on the first phase of contraction produced by electrical field stimulation would appear to be satisfactorily explained through the action of cicaprost on these post-junctional IP receptors. 7. Exogenous arachidonic acid is apparently converted predominantly to PGE2 by the vas deferens, since the action of arachidonic acid mimicked that of PGE2 and was reduced by indomethacin. However, there was little evidence that sufficient PGE2 is generated during a short period (15 s) of sympathetic nerve stimulation for it to have any significant inhibitory effect on the size of the contractions produced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.