Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8587106›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1995

Evolution of the response patterns to dietary carbohydrates and the developmental differentiation of gene expression of alpha-amylase in Drosophila.

N Inomata, K Kanda, M L Cariou, H Tachida, T Yamazaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Amylases of Insects.International journal of insect science · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

N InomataDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka prefecture, Japan.
K Kanda
M L Cariou
H Tachida
T Yamazaki
Kyushu University · JPCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraspecific variation of alpha-amylase activity in D. melanogaster and D. immigrans, which is distantly related to D. melanogaster, and interspecific variation of alpha-amylase activity in 18 Drosophila species were examined. The amount of intraspecific variation of alpha-amylase activities measured in terms of coefficient of variation in D. melanogaster and D. immigrans was one-half and one-tenth or less, respectively, of the interspecific variation in 18 Drosophila species. We also surveyed the response patterns of alpha-amylase activity to dietary carbohydrates at the larval and adult stages. The levels of alpha-amylase activity depended on both repression by dietary glucose (glucose repression) and induction by dietary starch (starch induction). In general, our data suggest that glucose repression was conserved among species at both stages while starch induction was mainly observed in larvae, although the degree of the response depended on species. In D. lebanonensis lebanonensis and D. serrata, larvae expressed electrophoretically different alpha-amylase variants (isozymes) from those of adult flies. These results may suggest that the regulatory systems responsible both for the response to environment and developmental expression are different among species in Drosophila.

Indexed as

alpha-AmylasesAnimalsDietary CarbohydratesDrosophilaEnzyme ActivationEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, Developmentalalpha-AmylasesDietary Carbohydrates

Identifiers

PMID8587106
OpenAlexW2026384381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.