ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1995
Reciprocal relationship between stem-loop potential and substitution density in retroviral quasispecies under positive Darwinian selection.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential Achilles heels of SARS-CoV-2 are best displayed by the base order-dependent component of RNA folding energy.Computational biology and chemistry · 2021Article
- Review
- Complexity of genetic mechanisms conferring nonuniformity of recombination in maize.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Quantifying selection against synonymous mutations in HIV-1 env evolution.Journal of virology · 2013Article
- FORS-D Analysis in P. falciparum can Differentiate Classes of Genes Under Selection.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2011Article
- The key role for local base order in the generation of multiple forms of China HIV-1 B'/C intersubtype recombinants.BMC evolutionary biology · 2005Article
- A biochemical mechanism for nonrandom mutations and evolution.Journal of bacteriology · 2000Review
- Stem-loop potential in MHC genes: a new way of evaluating positive Darwinian selection?Immunogenetics · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleic acids have the potential to form intrastrand stem-loops if complementary bases are suitably located. Computer analyses of poliovirus and retroviral RNAs have revealed a reciprocal relationship between "statistically significant" stem-loop potential and "sequence variability." The statistically significant stem-loop potential of a nucleic acid segment has been defined as a function of the difference between the folding energy of the natural segment (FONS) and the mean folding energy of a set of randomized (shuffled) versions of the natural segment (FORS-M). Since FONS is dependent on both base composition and base order, whereas FORS-M is solely dependent on base composition (a genomic characteristic), it follows that statistically significant stem-loop potential (FORS-D) is a function of base order (a local characteristic). In retroviral genomes, as in all DNA genomes studied, positive FORS-D values are widely distributed. Thus there have been pressures on base order both to encode specific functions and to encode stem-loops. As in the case of DNA genomes under positive Darwinian selection pressure, in HIV-1 specific function appears to dominate in rapidly evolving regions. Here high sequence variability, expressed as substitution density (not indel density), is associated with negative FORS-D values (impaired base-order-dependent stem-loop potential). This suggests that in these regions HIV-1 genomes are under positive selection pressure by host defenses. The general function of stem-loops is recombination. This is a vital process if, from among members of viral "quasispecies," functional genomes are to be salvaged. Thus, for rapidly evolving RNA genomes, it is as important to conserve base-order-dependent stem-loop potential as to conserve other functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8587101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.