Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8584440›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1996

Caffeine enhancement of electrical activity through direct blockade of inward rectifying K+ currents in GH3 rat anterior pituitary cells.

F Barros, D del Camino, L A Pardo, P de la Peña

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F BarrosDepartamento de Biología Funcional - Area de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, E-33006 Oviedo, Spain.
D del Camino
L A Pardo
P de la Peña
Universidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of rat anterior pituitary GH3 cells with caffeine causes a reversible enhancement of electrical activity superimposed over a depolarization of the plasma membrane potential. Similar results are obtained with theophylline, but not with isobutylmethylxanthine or forskolin. The effects of caffeine are not related to Ca2+ liberation from intracellular stores since they are not affected by incubation of the cells with ryanodine or thapsigargin. Furthermore, caffeine-induced hyperpolarization of the membrane is not detectable even in cells in which Ca2+ liberation from inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive compartments produces a prominent transient hyperpolarization in response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Reductions of Ca2+-dependent K+ currents caused by partial block of L-type Ca2+ channels by caffeine are not sufficient to explain the effects of the xanthine, since the results obtained with caffeine are not mimicked by direct blockade of Ca2+ channels with nisoldipine. GH3 cell inwardly rectifying K+ currents are inhibited by caffeine. Studies on the voltage dependence of the caffeine-induced effects indicate a close correlation between alterations of electrical parameters and reported values of steady-state voltage dependence of inactivation of these currents. We conclude that, as previously shown for thyrotropin-releasing hormone, modulation of inwardly rectifying K+ currents plays a major role determining the firing rate of GH3 cells and its enhancement by caffeine.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaffeineCalciumCalcium ChannelsCell LineMembrane PotentialsPituitary Gland, AnteriorPotassium ChannelsRatsTerpenesThapsigarginCaffeineCalciumCalcium ChannelsPotassium ChannelsTerpenesThapsigargin

Identifiers

PMID8584440
OpenAlexW1985010991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.