Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8583404›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1995

Heart rate responses to selective stimulation of cardiac vagal C fibres in anaesthetized cats, rats and rabbits.

J F Jones, Y Wang, D Jordan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Myths and realities of the cardiac vagus.The Journal of physiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J F JonesDepartment of Physiology, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.
Y Wang
D Jordan
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The contribution of cardiac vagal C fibres to vagal chronotropic control in anaesthetized cats, rats and rabbits was analysed using electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve with a selective anodal block technique. 2. After bilateral vagotomy and pretreatment with atenolol, 10 Hz continuous selective stimulation of unmyelinated fibres in the cut peripheral end of the cervical vagus evoked a bradycardia in anaesthetized rats, cats and rabbits. With this stimulation protocol the three species exhibited a similar lengthening of the heart period (R-R interval) when expressed as a percentage of their basal cardiac interval. 3. The mechanism of action of the selective blocking technique was analysed by recording eighty-nine single A- (n = 12), B- (n = 22) and C-fibre (n = 55) vagal-projecting neurones in the medulla of the rat. This demonstrated that the technique can selectively block conduction in myelinated fibres and that 'break excitation' is seen mainly in unmyelinated fibres. Although thirty C fibres showed break excitation sixteen did not and this difference could not be correlated with their axonal conduction velocity, chronaxie or initial segment frequency following. 4. Using the anodal block technique the vagal effects on heart rate were reanalysed in the cat by incorporating a collision technique. B fibres were activated orthodromically to evoke cardioinhibition and simultaneously antidromically to collide with errant B-fibre spikes activated at the electrode producing anodal block. With this protocol it was noted that the B- and C-fibre bradycardias were not additive. Using a double anodal block and collision technique, it was demonstrated that this phenomenon was likely to be due to occlusion of the effects of B and C fibres. 5. In conclusion, in addition to the well-defined effects of vagal B fibres on heart rate, selective stimulation of vagal C fibres also had a cardioinhibitory effect in all three species studied. However, since the effects of cardiac C fibres on heart rate was small, these neurones alone cannot account for the cardioinhibition of the pulmonary chemoreflex. It is likely that activation of both B- and C-fibre cardiac vagal preganglionic neurones accounts for this reflex cardioinhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsElectric StimulationHeart RateNerve FibersRabbitsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID8583404
PMCPMC1156804
OpenAlexW2011885451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.