Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8581300›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1995

ZOO-FISH analysis: cat and human karyotypes closely resemble the putative ancestral mammalian karyotype.

G Rettenberger, C Klett, U Zechner, J Bruch, W Just, W Vogel, H Hameister

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microarray-based cytogenetic profiling reveals recurrent and subtype-associated genomic copy number aberrations in feline sarcomas.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2009
    Article
  12. Phylogenomics of the dog and fox family (Canidae, Carnivora) revealed by chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Reconstruction of the ancestral ferungulate karyotype by electronic chromosome painting (E-painting).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2006
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Chromosome evolution in bears: reconstructing phylogenetic relationships by cross-species chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Highly conserved chromosomes in an Asian squirrel (Menetes berdmorei, Rodentia: Sciuridae) as demonstrated by ZOO-FISH with human probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  20. The genome phylogeny of domestic cat, red panda and five mustelid species revealed by comparative chromosome painting and G-banding.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G RettenbergerInstitut für Nutztierwissenschaften ETH-Zürich, Switzerland.
C Klett
U Zechner
J Bruch
W Just
W Vogel
H Hameister
Universität Ulm · DEETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA in situ hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries was applied to compare the karyotypes of humans (Homo sapiens, 2n = 46) and cats (Felis catus, 2n = 38). For the autosomes alone, 30 segments of conserved synteny were revealed. The arrangement of these segments in the feline karyotype differs by only seven single chromosome breaks and one intrachromosomal inversion from their arrangement in humans. Comparison of these data with those recently obtained for pig and those available from conventional gene mapping studies in mice and cattle has allowed us to develop a model of karyotype evolution in mammals. The cat and human karyotypes, with 36 and 44 autosomes respectively, were found to be very similar to a putative ancient mammalian founder karyotype. It would appear that during evolution to the human karyotype the status quo has been conserved for at least some 100-120 million years. There has been no need to alter the well-balanced gene arrangement of the mammalian founder karyotype.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingAnimalsCatsCattleChromosomesDogsFibroblastsHumansMammalsMiceSpecies SpecificitySwine

Identifiers

PMID8581300
OpenAlexW2076828557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.