Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8577716›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996

Archaeal-eubacterial mergers in the origin of Eukarya: phylogenetic classification of life.

L Margulis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. LEA Proteins and the Evolution of the WHy Domain.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution.Journal of theoretical biology · 2017
    Article
  16. The Physiology of Phagocytosis in the Context of Mitochondrial Origin.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Open Questions on the Origin of Eukaryotes.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L MargulisDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003-5810, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A symbiosis-based phylogeny leads to a consistent, useful classification system for all life. "Kingdoms" and "Domains" are replaced by biological names for the most inclusive taxa: Prokarya (bacteria) and Eukarya (symbiosis-derived nucleated organisms). The earliest Eukarya, anaerobic mastigotes, hypothetically originated from permanent whole-cell fusion between members of Archaea (e.g., Thermoplasma-like organisms) and of Eubacteria (e.g., Spirochaeta-like organisms). Molecular biology, life-history, and fossil record evidence support the reunification of bacteria as Prokarya while subdividing Eukarya into uniquely defined subtaxa: Protoctista, Animalia, Fungi, and Plantae.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaEukaryotaFungiPlantsSpirochaetaThermoplasmaNASA Discipline ExobiologyNASA Discipline Number 52-30NASA Program ExobiologyNon-NASA Center

Identifiers

PMID8577716
PMCPMC40032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.