Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8575816›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics1996

Stem-loop potential in MHC genes: a new way of evaluating positive Darwinian selection?

D R Forsdyke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D R ForsdykeDepartment of Biochemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domains of polymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins which interact with peptides and T-cell receptors are considered to have been under positive evolutionary selection pressure. Evidence for this is a high ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous mutations in the corresponding genomic domains. By this criterion snake venom phospholipase A2 genes have also been under positive selection pressure. Recent studies of the latter genes indicate that positive selection has overridden an evolutionary pressure on base order which normally promotes the potential to extrude single-strand stem-loops from supercoiled duplex DNA ( fold pressure ). This has resulted in base order-dependent stem-loop potential being shifted to introns, which are highly conserved between species. It is now shown that, like snake venom phospholipase A2 genes, the domains of polymorphic MHC genes which appear to have responded to positive selection pressure have decreased base order-dependent stem-loop potential. The evolutionary pressure to generate stem-loop potential (believed to be important for recombination) has been overridden less in exons under negative purifying selection than in exons under positive Darwinian selection. Thus, base order-dependent stem-loop potential shows promise as an independent indicator of positive selection.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionNucleic Acid ConformationSelection, GeneticAnimalsComputer SimulationGenes, MHC Class IGenes, MHC Class IIH-2 AntigensHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceModels, ChemicalModels, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticH-2 Antigens

Identifiers

PMID8575816
OpenAlexW2010685854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.