Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8575242›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1996

Chromosome 'painting' in plants - a feasible technique?

J Fuchs, A Houben, A Brandes, I Schubert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chromosome painting in plants: history and future perspectives.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The art of painting chromosome loops.Quantitative plant biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chromosomes in the flow to simplify genome analysis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Chromosome-based genomics in the cereals.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  19. Comparative genomic in situ hybridization (cGISH) analysis on plant chromosomes revealed by labelled Arabidopsis DNA.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2001
    Article
  20. Chromosome painting in Drosophila.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J FuchsInstitute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.
A Houben
A Brandes
I Schubert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is shown that chromosome painting is as yet not possible for plants with very complex genomes, neither intra- nor interspecific. The reasons are inefficient blocking of dispersed repetitive sequences and insufficient signal intensity of short unique sequences. Future perspective are indicated.

Indexed as

BiotinChromosomesDNA ProbesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePlantsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidBiotinDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID8575242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.