Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8567934›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1995

Co-expression in CHO cells of two muscle proteins involved in excitation-contraction coupling.

H Takekura, H Takeshima, S Nishimura, M Takahashi, T Tanabe, V Flockerzi, F Hofmann, C Franzini-Armstrong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. N-arachidonoyl glycine, another endogenous agonist of GPR55.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2017
    Article
  3. ER-plasma membrane junctions: Why and how do we study them?Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2017
    Review
  4. 3D Structure of the Dihydropyridine Receptor of Skeletal Muscle.European journal of translational myology · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Functional nonequality of the cardiac and skeletal ryanodine receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1997
    Article
  19. Formation of junctions involved in excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal and cardiac muscle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

H TakekuraDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19143-6058, USA.
H Takeshima
S Nishimura
M Takahashi
T Tanabe
V Flockerzi
F Hofmann
C Franzini-Armstrong
Technical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USInternational Institute for Advanced Studies · JPMitsubishi Group (Japan) · JP

Funding

PHS HHS 15835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ryanodine receptors and dihydropyridine receptors are located opposite each other at the junctions between sarcoplasmic reticulum and either the surface membrane or the transverse tubules in skeletal muscle. Ryanodine receptors are the calcium release channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and their cytoplasmic domains form the feet, connecting sarcoplasmic reticulum to transverse tubules. Dihydropyridine receptors are L-type calcium channels that act as the voltage sensors of excitation-contraction coupling: they sense surface membrane and transverse tubule depolarization and induce opening of the sarcoplasmic reticulum release channels. In skeletal muscle, ryanodine receptors are arranged in extensive arrays and dihydropyridine receptors are grouped into tetrads, which in turn are associated with the four subunits of ryanodine receptors. The disposition allows for a direct interaction between the two sets of molecules. CHO cells were stably transformed with plasmids for skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors and either the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor, or a skeletal-cardiac dihydropyridine receptor chimera (CSk3) which can functionally substitute for the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor, in addition to plasmids for the alpha 2, beta and gamma subunits. RNA blot hybridization gave positive results for all components. Immunoblots, ryanodine binding, electron microscopy and exposure to caffeine show that the expressed ryanodine receptors forms functional tetrameric channels, which are correctly inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, and form extensive arrays with the same spacings as in skeletal muscle. Since formation of arrays does not require coexpression of dihydropyridine receptors, we conclude that self-aggregation is an independent property of ryanodine receptors. All dihydropyridine receptor-expressing clones show high affinity binding for dihydropyridine and immunolabelling with antibodies against dihydropyridine receptor. The presence of calcium currents with fast kinetics and immunolabelling for dihydropyridine receptors in the surface membrane of CSk3 clones indicate that CSk3-dihydropyridine receptors are appropriately targeted to the cell's plasmalemma. The expressed skeletal-type dihydropyridine receptors, however, remain mostly located within perinuclear membranes. In cells coexpressing functional dihydropyridine receptors and ryanodine receptors, no junctions between feet-bearing endoplasmic reticulum elements and surface membrane are formed, and dihydropyridine receptors do not assemble into tetrads. A separation between dihydropyridine receptors and ryanodine receptors is not unique to CHO cells, but is found also in cardiac muscle, in muscles of invertebrates and, under certain conditions, in skeletal muscle. We suggest that failure to form junctions in co-transfected CHO cell may be due to lack of an essential protein necessary either for the initial docking of the endoplasmic reticulum to the surface membrane or for maintaining the interaction between dihydropyridine receptors and ryanodine receptors. We also conclude that formation of tetrads requires a close interaction between dihydropyridine receptors and ryanodine receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, NorthernBlotting, WesternCaffeineCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, L-TypeCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCell FractionationCHO CellsCricetinaeElectrophysiologyEndoplasmic ReticulumFreeze FracturingGene ExpressionImmunohistochemistryIntercellular JunctionsCaffeineCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, L-TypeCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsMuscle ProteinsRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel

Identifiers

PMID8567934
OpenAlexW1971311671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.