Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8567906›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology1995

Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by Amplicor PCR.

D F Moore, J I Curry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D F MoorePublic Health Laboratory, Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California 92706, USA.
J I Curry
Orange County Healthcare Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sputum specimens received for the diagnosis of tuberculosis or other mycobacterial infections were tested by a PCR-based assay and culture techniques. Results of the PCR assay (Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis Test) were compared with results of standard culture techniques with cultures held for 6 weeks. One thousand nine specimens were included: 301 retrospective specimens (frozen at -70 degrees C and later tested by PCR) and 708 prospective specimens (tested within 1 day of processing). One hundred sixty-two (16%) of the specimens were culture positive for M. tuberculosis; 83 (51%) of these were also fluorochrome stain positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the Amplicor PCR compared with those of culture were 83% (134 of 162 specimens) and 97% (800 of 827 specimens), respectively. The sensitivity for fluorochrome stain-positive specimens was 99%, and that for fluorochrome stain-negative specimens was 66%. The great majority of the 28 PCR-negative, culture-positive specimens were low positives; 27 were smear negative and 19 contained < 100 CFU of M. tuberculosis per ml. The 27 PCR-positive, culture-negative specimens included 24 that were positive by repeat testing by alternate primer PCR and were from patients with tuberculosis on antimicrobial therapy. With these considered culture misses, the final sensitivities of PCR and culture were 85, and 87%, respectively, while the specificities were 99.6 and 100%, respectively. After normal laboratory processing of sputum specimens, the Amplicor PCR assay can be completed in 8 h. Thus, it is possible to have results available within 10 h of specimen submission.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticFluorescent DyesHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySputumStaining and LabelingTime FactorsTuberculosisFluorescent DyesReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID8567906
PMCPMC228556
OpenAlexW2137200786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.