Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8565045›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology1995

Differential desensitization properties of rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit combinations expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

C R Vibat, J A Lasalde, M G McNamee, E L Ochoa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Crystal structure of a human neuronal nAChR extracellular domain in pentameric assembly: Ligand-bound α2 homopentamer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Phenotypic characterization of an alpha 4 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit knock-out mouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2000
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Influence of subunit composition on desensitization of neuronal acetylcholine receptors at low concentrations of nicotine.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1997
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C R VibatSection of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California at Davis 95616, USA.
J A Lasalde
M G McNamee
E L Ochoa
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

CHEMICAL MODIFICATIONS OF THE ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORR01NS022941 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MCNAMEE, MARK G · 1986 to 1994
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS22941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Chronic administration of nicotine up-regulates mammalian neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). A key hypothesis that explains up-regulation assumes that nicotine induces desensitization of receptor function. This is correlated with behaviorally expressed tolerance to the drug. 2. The present experiments were conducted to: (a) obtain information on the nicotine-induced desensitization of neuronal nAChR function, a less understood phenomenon as compared to that of the muscle and electric fish receptor counterparts; (b) test the hypothesis that different receptor subunit combinations exhibit distinct desensitization patterns. 3. Xenopus laevis oocytes were injected with mRNAs encoding rat receptor subunits alpha 2, alpha 3, or alpha 4 in pairwise combination with the beta 2 subunit. The responses to various concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh) or nicotine were analyzed by the two electrode voltage clamp technique. 4. Concentration-effect curves showed that nicotine was more potent than ACh for all the receptor subunit combinations tested. Only the alpha 4 beta 2 combination exhibited a depression of the maximum effect at concentrations higher than 20 microM nicotine. 5. After a single nicotine pulse, receptor desensitization (calculated as a single exponential decay) was significantly slower for alpha 4 beta 2 than for either alpha 3 beta 2 or alpha 2 beta 2. 6. Concentrations of nicotine that attained a near maximum effect were applied, washed, and re-applied in four minute cycles. The responses were calculated as percentages of the current evoked by the initial application. Following 16 minutes of this protocol, the alpha 4 beta 2 combination showed a greater reduction of the original response as compared to the alpha 2 beta 2 and alpha 3 beta 2 subunit combinations. Taking points 5 and 6 together, these experiments suggest that the alpha 4 beta 2 receptor subtype desensitizes at a slower rate and remains longer in the desensitized state. 7. Because alpha 4 beta 2 is the main receptor subunit combination within the brain and is up-regulated by nicotine, our data may be important for understanding the molecular basis of tolerance to this drug.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsDrug ToleranceEgtazic AcidElectrophysiologyHEPESIsotonic SolutionsNeuronsNicotineOocytesRatsReceptors, NicotinicRinger's SolutionSensitivity and SpecificityUp-RegulationXenopus laevisAcetylcholineEgtazic AcidHEPESIsotonic SolutionsNicotineReceptors, NicotinicRinger's Solution

Identifiers

PMID8565045
PMCPMC11563130
OpenAlexW1987114448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.