ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Neuroprotective properties of lifarizine compared with those of other agents in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischaemia.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classification of drugs based on properties of sodium channel inhibition: a comparative automated patch-clamp study.PloS one · 2010Article
- Cyclosporin A aggravates electroshock-induced convulsions in mice with a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2005Article
- Limiting neurological damage after stroke: a review of pharmacological treatment options.Drugs & aging · 1999Review
- Inhibition by lifarizine of intracellular Ca2+ rises and glutamate exocytosis in depolarized rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes and cultured neurones.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Changes in the peripheral type benzodiazepine binding site density following middle cerebral artery occlusion in the mouse, have been used as a marker of neuronal damage. These sites can be identified using the selective ligand [3H]-PK 11195 located on non neuronal cells, macrophages and astroglia, within the CNS. Glial cell proliferation and macrophage invasion is an unvoidable sequelae to cerebral ischaemic injury, secondary to neuronal loss. Following occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery (left MCA) a reproducible lesion was found in the parietal cortex within 7 days which gave rise to a significant increase in [3H]-PK 11195 binding. 2. Treatment of animals with the sodium channel blocker, lifarizine, significantly reduced the ischaemia-induced increase in [3H]-PK 11195 binding when given either 30 min pre-ischaemia and three times daily for 7 days at 0.5 mg kg-1, i.p. (P < 0.01) or delayed until 15 min post-ischaemia and three times daily for 7 days at 0.5 mg kg-1, i.p. (P < 0.001). Lifarizine was an effective neuroprotective agent in this model of focal ischaemia in the mouse. 3. Lifarizine also showed a dose-related protection against the ischaemia-induced increase in [3H]-PK 11195 binding with significant protection at doses of 0.1 mg kg-1, i.p. (P < 0.05), 0.25 mg kg-1, i.p. (P < 0.01) or 0.5 mg kg-1, i.p. (P < 0.01) 15 min post-ischaemia and b.i.d. for 7 days. No significant change is seen in the Kd for [3H]-PK 11195. The first dose could be delayed for up to 4 h after cerebralartery cauterization and protection was maintained.4. Phenytoin (28 mg kg-1, i.v. 15 min and 24 h post-ischaemia) was also neuroprotective in this model(P<0.01). This agent is thought to interact with voltage-dependent sodium channels to effect its anticonvulsantactions and this mechanism may also underlie its neuroprotective actions in focal cerebralischaemia.5. Agents with other mechanisms of action were also shown to have significant neuroprotection in this model. The non-competitive NMDA antagonist, MK 801, showed significant neuroprotection in the model when given at 0.5 mg kg-1, i.p. 30 min pre-ischaemia with t.i.d. dosing for 7 days (P< 0.001). The dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, nimodipine was not protective when given using the same dosing protocol as MK 801, 0.5 mg kg-1 30 min pre-occlusion and three times daily for 7 days but showed significant protection when given at 0.05 mg kg-1 15 min post-ischaemia and three times daily for 7days. The lipid peroxidation inhibitor, tirilazad (single dose 1 mg kg-1, i.v.) showed significant neuroprotection when given 5 min post-ischaemia but not when the first dose was delayed for 4 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.