Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8563538›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Alternatives to hospital care: what are they and who should decide?

J Coast, A Inglis, S Frankel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Inappropriate admissions: thoughts of patients and referring doctors.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2001
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Primary care education centres: educational innovation for all of the primary health care team is needed.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Primary care provision of specialist services.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  18. Keeping the meningococcus out of the media.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  19. Telemedicine: 'communication' by any other name?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J CoastDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Bristol.
A Inglis
S Frankel
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine potential for alternatives to care in hospitals for acute admissions, and to compare the decisions about these alternatives made by clinicians with different backgrounds.

designStandardised tool was used to identify patients who could potentially be treated in an alternative form of care. Information about such patients was assessed by three panels of clinicians: general practitioners without experience of general practitioner beds, general practitioners with experience of general practitioner beds, and consultants.

settingOne hospital for acute admissions in a rural area of the South and West region of England. SUBJECTS: Of 620 patients admitted to specialties of general medicine and care of the elderly, details of 112 were assessed by panels.

main outcome measuresProportion of hospitalised patients who could have received alternative care and identification of most appropriate alternative form of care.

resultsBoth general practitioner panels estimated that between 51 and 89 of the hospitalised patients could have received alternative care (equivalent to 8-14% of all admissions). Consultants estimated that between 25 and 55 patients could have had alternative care (5.5-9% of all admissions). General practitioner bed and urgent outpatient appointment were the main alternatives chosen by all three panels.

conclusionAbout 10% of admissions to general hospital might be suitable for alternative forms of care. Doctors with different backgrounds made similar overall assessments of most appropriate forms of care.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseDecision MakingAgedAmbulatory CareChoice BehaviorCommunity Health ServicesConsultantsFamily PracticeHospitalsHumansMedical Staff, HospitalPatient AdmissionPatient Care PlanningUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID8563538
PMCPMC2349858
OpenAlexW1969885773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.