Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8562349›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer1996

Phase II clinical trials with rhizoxin in breast cancer and melanoma. The EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

A R Hanauske, G Catimel, S Aamdal, W ten Bokkel Huinink, R Paridaens, N Pavlidis, S B Kaye, A te Velde, J Wanders, J Verweij

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Toward a Cancer Drug of Fungal Origin.Medicinal research reviews · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A new tubulin-binding site and pharmacophore for microtubule-destabilizing anticancer drugs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

A R HanauskeI. Department of Medicine, Klinikum rechts, Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany.
G Catimel
S Aamdal
W ten Bokkel Huinink
R Paridaens
N Pavlidis
S B Kaye
A te Velde
J Wanders
J Verweij
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · NLCentre Léon Bérard · FRErasmus University Rotterdam · NLKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEKU Leuven · BEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizoxin is a new anti-tumour agent isolated from the pathogenic fungus Rhizopus chinensis. It has shown broad activity against murine tumour models and is also active against vinca alkaloid-resistant cells. The purpose of our studies was to determine the clinical activity of this compound in patients with advanced breast cancer and melanoma. Based on the results of a phase I study, 2.0 mg m-2 was administered as intravenous infusion over 5 min every 21 days. Nineteen patients were entered into the breast cancer phase II trial and received a total of 50 courses (median 2, range 1-6). Of these, dose reductions were performed in three courses because of leucopenia or stomatitis (1.5 mg m-2, one course; 1.45 mg m-2, two courses). Twenty-six patients were entered into the melanoma trial and received a total of 70 courses (median 2, range 1-12). No dose reductions were required. All patients were eligible for toxicity. Haematological toxicity included neutropenia CTC grade 3 (29/120 courses, 24.2%) and grade 4 (11/20 courses, 9.2%). Only drug-related CTC grade 1 thrombocytopenia was observed. Non-haematological toxicity included alopecia in all patients after two courses of treatment as well as CTC grade 3/4 stomatitis and asthenia. In the breast cancer study, one patient achieved a more than 50% tumour reduction after six cycles but was progressing after 6 weeks. Another patient showed a partial remission after the first course but was taken off the study because of CTC grade 3 skin toxicity. One patient was not evaluable for response (early death). No objective remissions were observed in 15 evaluable patients. In melanoma, no objective remissions were observed. We conclude that rhizoxin can be safely administered at 2.0 mg m-2 every 3 weeks. However, it has little activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and melanoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHematopoiesisHumansLactonesMacrolidesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticLactonesMacrolidesrhizoxin

Identifiers

PMID8562349
PMCPMC2074418
OpenAlexW1986485491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.