Trial reportBritish journal of cancer1996
Phase II clinical trials with rhizoxin in breast cancer and melanoma. The EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicentre phase II pharmacological evaluation of rhizoxin. Eortc early clinical studies (ECSG)/pharmacology and molecular mechanisms (PAMM) groups.British journal of cancer · 1996Trial
- Antitumor properties of fungal-derived compounds: potential applications in skin cancer therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Ecological Diversity, Metabolic Versatility, and Biotechnological Applications ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Endophytic fungi: A future prospect for breast cancer therapeutics and drug development.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Ring-Closing Metathesis Approaches towards the Total Synthesis of Rhizoxins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Targeting and extending the eukaryotic druggable genome with natural products: cytoskeletal targets of natural products.Natural product reports · 2020Review
- A fluorescence anisotropy assay to discover and characterize ligands targeting the maytansine site of tubulin.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Toward a Cancer Drug of Fungal Origin.Medicinal research reviews · 2015Review
- Stabilizing versus destabilizing the microtubules: a double-edge sword for an effective cancer treatment option?Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2015Review
- Endophytic and epiphytic microbes as "sources" of bioactive agents.Frontiers in chemistry · 2015Review
- A new tubulin-binding site and pharmacophore for microtubule-destabilizing anticancer drugs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Bacterial endosymbiosis is widely present among zygomycetes but does not contribute to the pathogenesis of mucormycosis.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2008Article
- Isolation and identification of rhizoxin analogs from Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 by using a genomic mining strategy.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhizoxin is a new anti-tumour agent isolated from the pathogenic fungus Rhizopus chinensis. It has shown broad activity against murine tumour models and is also active against vinca alkaloid-resistant cells. The purpose of our studies was to determine the clinical activity of this compound in patients with advanced breast cancer and melanoma. Based on the results of a phase I study, 2.0 mg m-2 was administered as intravenous infusion over 5 min every 21 days. Nineteen patients were entered into the breast cancer phase II trial and received a total of 50 courses (median 2, range 1-6). Of these, dose reductions were performed in three courses because of leucopenia or stomatitis (1.5 mg m-2, one course; 1.45 mg m-2, two courses). Twenty-six patients were entered into the melanoma trial and received a total of 70 courses (median 2, range 1-12). No dose reductions were required. All patients were eligible for toxicity. Haematological toxicity included neutropenia CTC grade 3 (29/120 courses, 24.2%) and grade 4 (11/20 courses, 9.2%). Only drug-related CTC grade 1 thrombocytopenia was observed. Non-haematological toxicity included alopecia in all patients after two courses of treatment as well as CTC grade 3/4 stomatitis and asthenia. In the breast cancer study, one patient achieved a more than 50% tumour reduction after six cycles but was progressing after 6 weeks. Another patient showed a partial remission after the first course but was taken off the study because of CTC grade 3 skin toxicity. One patient was not evaluable for response (early death). No objective remissions were observed in 15 evaluable patients. In melanoma, no objective remissions were observed. We conclude that rhizoxin can be safely administered at 2.0 mg m-2 every 3 weeks. However, it has little activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.