Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8557751›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1995

Targeted disruption of CD44 in MDAY-D2 lymphosarcoma cells has no effect on subcutaneous growth or metastatic capacity.

M H Driessens, P J Stroeken, N F Rodriguez Erena, M A van der Valk, E A van Rijthoven, E Roos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Animal Models of Bone Metastasis.Veterinary pathology · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CD44 cell adhesion molecules.Molecular pathology : MP · 1999
    Review
  7. CD44 variant isoform expression and breast cancer prognosis.Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann · 1998
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CD44 in inflammation and metastasis.Glycoconjugate journal · 1997
    Review
  11. CD44 and the adhesion of neoplastic cells.Molecular pathology : MP · 1997
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M H DriessensDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P J Stroeken
N F Rodriguez Erena
M A van der Valk
E A van Rijthoven
E Roos
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD44 splice variants have been shown to be involved in metastasis of carcinomas. In addition, the standard form of CD44 has been implicated in metastasis, particularly of melanomas and lymphomas. To investigate this, we have generated a CD44-negative mutant of the highly metastatic murine MDAY-D2 lymphosarcoma. The two CD44 alleles of this diploid cell line were sequentially disrupted by homologous recombination, using isogenic CD44 genomic constructs interrupted by a neomycin or hygromycin resistance-conferring gene. The resulting double knockout (DKO) cells had completely lost the capacity to bind to immobilized hyaluronic acid, but did not differ from MDAY-D2 cells in integrin expression or in vitro growth. Subcutaneous (s.c.) growth potential and metastatic capacity of MDAY-D2 and DKO cells were assessed by s.c. and i.v. injection of the lowest cell dose (10(3) or 10(4), respectively) that gave rise to tumor formation by MDAY-D2 cells in approximately 100% of the mice. Quite unexpectedly, we observed no difference at all in either s.c. growth rate or local invasion into surrounding tissues between MDAY-D2 cells and the CD44-negative DKO cells. Also hematogenous metastasis formation upon i.v. injection was similar: both parental and DKO cells metastasized extensively to the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. We conclude that, at least for these MDAY-D2 lymphosarcoma cells, the standard form of CD44 is dispensable for tumor growth and metastasis. Our results show that targeted disruption of genes in tumor cells is a feasible approach to study their role in tumorigenesis and metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell AdhesionCell DivisionEnzymes, ImmobilizedHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic AcidInjections, SubcutaneousIntegrinsLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMiceMolecular Sequence DataMutationNeoplasm MetastasisTumor Cells, CulturedEnzymes, ImmobilizedHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic AcidIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID8557751
PMCPMC2120664
OpenAlexW2166112655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.