Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8557347›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1996

Responses to vaccination in strains of mice that differ in susceptibility to coccidiosis.

M E Rose, P Hesketh, D Wakelin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M E RoseDepartment of Immunology and Pathology, Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Near Newbury, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
P Hesketh
D Wakelin
Newbury College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BALB/c mice are normally resistant to infection with Eimeria vermiformis than C57BL/6 (B6) mice, but these phenotypes were reversed by prior vaccination with crude antigens prepared from developmental stages of the parasite: B6 mice were protected, and BALB/c mice were made more susceptible. Infections with a heterologous species, E. pragensis, were unaffected when this was given either alone or together with E. vermiformis. In both strains of mice, vaccination induced serum antibody responses to E. vermiformis and the levels were boosted by superimposed infection, the highest values being found in BALB/c mice. Cellular responses in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), as indicated by cellularity and proliferation, either unstimulated or restimulated in vitro with E. vermiformis antigen, were decreased in both strains, but markedly more in BALB/c than B6. The capacity of MLN cells to transfer immunity to naive recipients was lowered by vaccination of BALB/c donors but unimpaired in vaccinated B6 mice. Responses to the mitogen, concanavalin A, and to unrelated antigens (human erythrocytes and fowl gamma globulin) were unaffected. Thus, parenteral vaccination, which increased the susceptibility of BALB/c mice to infection with E. vermiformis, had a depressing effect on some specific immune responses in the MLN. It was surprising to find some reduction in the cellular responses of the MLN of B6 mice also, although they were protected by vaccination.

Indexed as

VaccinationAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCell DivisionCoccidiosisDisease SusceptibilityEimeriaFemaleImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymph NodesLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLProtozoan VaccinesAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanProtozoan Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID8557347
PMCPMC173752
OpenAlexW2188047234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.