Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8557053›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal1995

mRNA retroposition in human cells: processed pseudogene formation.

J Maestre, T Tchénio, O Dhellin, T Heidmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) reveals non-coding pseudogene CDC27P9 role in cervical cancer.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comprehensive analysis ofCancer cell international · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comprehensive analysis of endogenous bornavirus-like elements in eukaryote genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J MaestreUnité de Physicochimie et Pharmacologie des Macromolécules Biologiques, CNRS URA 147, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
T Tchénio
O Dhellin
T Heidmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a sensitive assay for detection of reverse transcription events, we demonstrate that human HeLa cells can 'retropose', i.e. reverse transcribe and integrate, the mRNA of a naive reporter gene, at a low but detectable frequency. Furthermore, we show that the retroposed copies have all the hallmarks of the processed pseudogenes naturally found in the mammalian genome: they lack intron and 5' promoter sequence, they have acquired a 3' poly(A) tail, and they are flanked by short repeats (< 15 bp) of target DNA sequence. These results demonstrate that human cells possess an endogenous reverse transcription activity, which is not restricted to transcripts of transposable elements, and which is likely to be involved in the formation, still ongoing, of a large fraction of the eukaryotic genome.

Indexed as

PseudogenesBase SequenceDNA PrimersGenes, ReporterHeLa CellsHumansMolecular Sequence DataRetroelementsRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalTranscription, GeneticDNA PrimersRetroelementsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID8557053
PMCPMC394758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.