ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology1994
Epitope-specific antibody response against glycoprotein E of pseudorabies virus.
Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protection induced by a glycoprotein E-deleted bovine herpesvirus type 1 marker strain used either as an inactivated or live attenuated vaccine in cattle.BMC veterinary research · 2014Trial
- Expression and purification of Suid Herpesvirus-1 glycoprotein E in the baculovirus system and its use to diagnose Aujeszky's disease in infected pigs.Protein expression and purification · 2013Article
- Correlation between the presence of neutralizing antibodies against porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and protection against replication of the virus and development of PCV2-associated disease.BMC veterinary research · 2006Article
- Development of a latex agglutination test using the major epitope domain of glycoprotein E of pseudorabies virus expressed in E. coli to differentiate between immune responses in pigs naturally infected or vaccinated with pseudorabies virus.Veterinary research communications · 2005Article
- An indirect double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using baculovirus-expressed antigen for the detection of antibodies to glycoprotein E of pseudorabies virus and comparison of the method with blocking ELISAs.Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study we investigated the epitope-specific antibody response against glycoprotein E (gE) of pseudorabies virus. Epitope-specific antibody responses were investigated by enzyme-linked immunoperoxidase monolayer assays. In a vaccinated crossbred pig population, most pigs responded to antigenic domain E and to a lesser degree to antigenic domains C and D. Only few pigs responded to antigenic domains F, A, and B. Using vaccinated pigs, we investigated the influence of two different pseudorabies virus strains and the genetic background of the host on the epitope-specific antibody response. More pigs infected with the virulent NIA-3 strain had a detectable antibody response against antigenic domains C, F and A than did pigs infected with the mildly virulent Sterksel strain (P < or = 0.05; Fisher's exact test). No differences in the epitope-specific antibody responses of two genetically different pig breeding lines were observed (P > or = 0.1; Fisher's exact test). In both breeding lines the incidence of the epitope-specific antibody response was comparable to that in the crossbred pig population. In addition, we studied the epitope-specific antibody responses were strikingly different and indicated that genetic background influenced the epitope-specific antibody response. Of the serum samples of mice with C57BL and a BALB background, 40 and 17% respectively, were positive in the one of the epitope-specific immunoassays. In contrast to pigs, mice responded predominantly to antigenic domain D and to a lesser degree to antigenic domains E and B. Only few mice had a detectable antibody response against antigenic domains C and A, and none had a detectable antibody response against antigenic domain F.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.