Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8554839›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1995

Variation in prescribing of hypnotics, anxiolytics and antidepressants between 61 general practices.

P D Pharoah, D Melzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Visualizing nationwide variation in medicare Part D prescribing patterns.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Variations in anxiolytic and hypnotic prescribing by GPs: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  8. Factors influencing variation in prescribing of antidepressants by general practices in Scotland.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Morbidity, deprivation, and antidepressant prescribing in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Relationship between practice counselling and referral to outpatient psychiatry and clinical psychology.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P D PharoahDepartment of Health Policy and Public Health, Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Commission, Fulbourn Hospital.
D Melzer
Fulbourn Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the desirability of reducing prescribing of hypnotics and anxiolytics has long been recognized, variation between practices in patterns of psychotropic drug prescribing has received little attention; factors underlying such variation are poorly understood.

aimThe study aimed to describe the extent of variation between general practices in the prescribing of hypnotics, anxiolytics and antidepressants; it also aimed to analyse the influence of measures of practice population and general practice and general practitioner characteristics on any variation in prescribing volumes.

methodRoutinely collected prescribing data and practice population data, from April 1992 to March 1993, from all 61 practices in the Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Commission were analysed. Prescribing was measured as annual defined daily doses per 1000 practice population for each drug class. Data on variables relating to practice structure and general practitioner characteristics were obtained and analysed. Potentially influencing variables were investigated by multiple regression.

resultsBetween the highest and lowest prescribing practices there was an 11-fold difference, a 13-fold difference and an eightfold difference in the annual defined daily doses per 1000 practice population prescribed for hypnotics, for anxiolytics and for antidepressants, respectively. Strong positive correlations existed between volumes of prescribing of each drug class. The drugs prescribed in the greatest volumes were hypnotics. Practice population structure had some influence on psychotropic drug prescribing with high prescribing being associated with the proportions of temporary residents and women aged 65 years and over in the practice for all three classes of drug. Other factors, including presence of a practice counsellor, were not found to have a significant influence on psychotropic drug prescribing.

conclusionThe degree of variation in prescribing volumes of psychotropic drugs between practices raises serious concerns. Further study is needed, but progress will be hampered until there is more clarity over the effectiveness and appropriateness of using these substances in the various illness, symptom and life-stress presentations seen in primary care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Psychotropic DrugsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsHypnotics and SedativesPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID8554839
PMCPMC1239434
OpenAlexW156342259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.