Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8554052›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1996

Lack of X inactivation associated with maternal X isodisomy: evidence for a counting mechanism prior to X inactivation during human embryogenesis.

B R Migeon, P Jeppesen, B S Torchia, S Fu, M A Dunn, J Axelman, B J Schmeckpeper, J Fantes, R T Zori, D J Driscoll

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B R MigeonCenter for Medical Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287-3914, USA.
P Jeppesen
B S Torchia
S Fu
M A Dunn
J Axelman
B J Schmeckpeper
J Fantes
R T Zori
D J Driscoll
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Florida · USWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

MAMMALIAN X INACTIVATION CENTERR01HD029044 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MIGEON, BARBARA R · 1992 to 1996
–
NICHD NIH HHS HD05465NICHD NIH HHS HD29044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously reported functional disomy for X-linked genes in females with tiny ring X chromosomes and a phenotype significantly more abnormal than Turner syndrome. In such cases the disomy results from failure of these X chromosomes to inactivate because they lack DNA sequences essential for cis X inactivation. Here we describe a novel molecular mechanism for functional X disomy that is associated with maternal isodisomy. In this case, the severe mental retardation and multiple congenital abnormalities in a female with a mosaic 45,X/ 46,X,del(X)(q21.3-qter)/ 46X,r(X) karyotype are associated with overexpression of the genes within Xpter to Xq21.31 in many of her cells. Her normal X, ring X, and deleted linear X chromosomes originate from the same maternal X chromosome, and all are transcriptionally active. None expresses X inactive specific transcript (XIST), although the locus and region of the putative X inactivation center (XIC) are present on both normal and linear deleted X chromosomes. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a functional maternal X isodisomy, and the largest X chromosome to escape inactivation. In addition, these results (1) show that cis inactivation does not invariably occur in human females with two X chromosomes, even when the XIC region is present on both of them; (2) provide evidence for a critical time prior to the visible onset of X inactivation in the embryo when decisions about X inactivation are made; and (3) support the hypothesis that the X chromosome counting mechanism involves chromosomal imprinting, occurs prior to the onset of random inactivation, and is required for subsequent inactivation of the chromosome.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionPloidiesSex Chromosome AberrationsX ChromosomeCell DivisionCells, CulturedChildChromosome MappingDNA ReplicationEmbryonic and Fetal DevelopmentFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansHybrid CellsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8554052
PMCPMC1914932
OpenAlexW1538944852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.