ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1996
Lack of X inactivation associated with maternal X isodisomy: evidence for a counting mechanism prior to X inactivation during human embryogenesis.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Long non-coding RNA SeT and miR-155 regulate the Tnfα gene allelic expression profile.PloS one · 2017Article
- Cytogenetic contribution to uniparental disomy (UPD).Molecular cytogenetics · 2010Article
- Turner syndrome and the evolution of human sexual dimorphism.Evolutionary applications · 2008Article
- Differential X reactivation in human placental cells: implications for reversal of X inactivation.American journal of human genetics · 2005Article
- Complex and segmental uniparental disomy (UPD): review and lessons from rare chromosomal complements.Journal of medical genetics · 2001Review
- Severe phenotype resulting from an active ring X chromosome in a female with a complex karyotype: characterisation and replication study.Journal of medical genetics · 1998Article
- Uniparental and functional X disomy in Turner syndrome patients with unexplained mental retardation and X derived marker chromosomes.Journal of medical genetics · 1998Article
- Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is common in fetuses or newborns associated with confined placental mosaicism.American journal of human genetics · 1997Article
- Prader-Willi syndrome in a child with mosaic trisomy 15 and mosaic triplo-X: a molecular analysis.Journal of medical genetics · 1997Article
- Uniparental disomy of the entire X chromosome in a female with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.American journal of human genetics · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We have previously reported functional disomy for X-linked genes in females with tiny ring X chromosomes and a phenotype significantly more abnormal than Turner syndrome. In such cases the disomy results from failure of these X chromosomes to inactivate because they lack DNA sequences essential for cis X inactivation. Here we describe a novel molecular mechanism for functional X disomy that is associated with maternal isodisomy. In this case, the severe mental retardation and multiple congenital abnormalities in a female with a mosaic 45,X/ 46,X,del(X)(q21.3-qter)/ 46X,r(X) karyotype are associated with overexpression of the genes within Xpter to Xq21.31 in many of her cells. Her normal X, ring X, and deleted linear X chromosomes originate from the same maternal X chromosome, and all are transcriptionally active. None expresses X inactive specific transcript (XIST), although the locus and region of the putative X inactivation center (XIC) are present on both normal and linear deleted X chromosomes. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a functional maternal X isodisomy, and the largest X chromosome to escape inactivation. In addition, these results (1) show that cis inactivation does not invariably occur in human females with two X chromosomes, even when the XIC region is present on both of them; (2) provide evidence for a critical time prior to the visible onset of X inactivation in the embryo when decisions about X inactivation are made; and (3) support the hypothesis that the X chromosome counting mechanism involves chromosomal imprinting, occurs prior to the onset of random inactivation, and is required for subsequent inactivation of the chromosome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8554052PMC1914932W1538944852What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.