Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8551632›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1996

PCR-in situ hybridization detection of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) tax proviral DNA in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with HTLV-1-associated neurologic disease.

M C Levin, R J Fox, T Lehky, M Walter, C H Fox, N Flerlage, R Bamford, S Jacobson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C LevinNeuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
R J Fox
T Lehky
M Walter
C H Fox
N Flerlage
R Bamford
S Jacobson
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCR-in situ hybridization (PCR-ISH) was developed and utilized to determine the distribution of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) tax proviral DNA in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from patients with HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). PCR-ISH of HTLV-1 tax DNA in PBL from patients with HAM/TSP revealed that 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 10,000 PBL contained virus. PCR-ISH was sensitive, because a positive signal was consistently demonstrated from the HTLV-1-infected cell lines HUT-102 (which contains four to six copies of HTLV-1 proviral DNA per cell) and MT-1 (which contains one to three copies of HTLV-1 proviral DNA per cell). Also, intracellular amplification by PCR-ISH significantly increased sensitivity compared with conventional ISH and was shown to be specific for HTLV-1 tax DNA. These results are in contrast to solution-phase PCR amplification in which greater than 1% of cells were estimated to be infected. The discordance between these results is discussed and may indicate that more than one copy of HTLV-1 tax proviral DNA is present in an individual PBL.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCell LineDNA PrimersDNA, ViralGene Products, taxHumansHuman T-lymphotropic virus 1In Situ HybridizationLymphocytesMolecular Sequence DataParaparesis, Tropical SpasticPolymerase Chain ReactionProvirusesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA PrimersDNA, ViralGene Products, tax

Identifiers

PMID8551632
PMCPMC189896
OpenAlexW1561753808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.