Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8550093›Full record

ReviewImmunogenetics1995

Mouse T-cell receptor variable gene segment families.

B Arden, S P Clark, D Kabelitz, T W Mak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunogenetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methods for Study of Mouse T Cell Receptor α and β Gene Rearrangements.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Specification of Vδ and Vα usage by Tcra/Tcrd locus V gene segment promoters.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The T-cell receptor is not hardwired to engage MHC ligands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B ArdenPaul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany.
S P Clark
D Kabelitz
T W Mak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All mouse T-cell receptor alpha/delta, beta, and gamma variable (Tcra/d-, b-, and g-V) gene segments were aligned to compare the sequences with one another, to group them into subfamilies, and to derive a name which complies with the standard nomenclature. It was necessary to change the names of some V gene segments because they conflicted with those of other segments. The traditional classification into subfamilies was re-evaluated using a much larger pool of sequences. In the mouse, most V gene segments can be grouped into subfamilies of closely related genes with significantly less similarity between different subfamilies.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceMiceMolecular Sequence DataReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaSequence AlignmentReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID8550093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.