ReviewDrugs1995
Prophylactic use of the new quinolones for prevention of nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit.
Review in Drugs, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new quinolone antimicrobial agents, particularly those with less activity against anaerobes, selectively prevent colonisation of the alimentary tract by Gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci without substantially affecting the normal anaerobic flora, which preserve the colonisation resistance of the gut. These properties ideally position this class of antibacterial agent for selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in the prevention of nosocomial infection. The rationale for this procedure is based on the presumption that a significant proportion of infections in compromised patients are endogenous in origin, arising from the host's own microbial flora. If this colonisation by potentially pathogenic microflora within the normal flora can be significantly reduced without being replaced by other more pathogenic microorganisms, the risk of endogenous infection should be minimised. The quinolones have proved to be ideal agents for use in preventing infection in bone marrow transplant and other neutropenic patients. They have been used for SDD in the general intensive care unit population, although the technique has not received widespread acceptance. There have been only 4 reported randomised studies using quinolones as part of SDD regimens and only 301 patients have been evaluated. Although the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia has been significantly reduced from 36 to 15%, no effect has been shown on mortality. The cost of using SDD is significantly less with the quinolones than with other regimens, and induction of resistance has not been noted. The new quinolones, and in particular the more recently developed agents with extended Gram-positive activity, appear to be ideally suited for SDD, and their careful evaluation in further large, well designed trials is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.