ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Evidence for ETA and ETB receptors in rat skin and an investigation of their function in the cutaneous microvasculature.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Local injection of endothelin-1 produces pain-like behavior and excitation of nociceptors in rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2001Article
- Effects of calcium antagonists on endothelin-1-induced myocardial ischaemia and oedema in the rat.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
1. The relative contribution of ETA and ETB receptors in the response of rat skin to endothelins was investigated by use of the selective ETB agonist IRL-1620 and the selective ETA antagonist BQ-123. 2. Binding data suggest the presence of ETA and ETB receptors as preincubation with [Ala3,11,18Nle7]-endothelin-1 reduced ET-1 binding by approximately 40%. 3. Intradermal injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1, 1-10 pmol/site) and ET-3 (3-100 pmol/site) induced a dose-dependent decrease in local blood flow assessed by 133Xe clearance at test sites in rat skin. 4. The endothelin analogue [Ala3,11,18Nle7]-ET-1 (30-1000 pmol/site) induced significant vasoconstriction (P < 0.05) at the highest doses used and the selective ETB receptor agonist, IRL-1620 [Suc[Glu9,Ala11,15] endothelin (8-21)], (0.01-100 pmol/site) acted in a potent manner to induce a significant (P < 0.01) dose-dependent decrease in 133Xe clearance. 5. Co-injection with the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (1 nmol/site), completely abolished the vasoconstriction to ET-1 and partially to ET-3, but had no effect on IRL-1620-induced vasoconstriction. In addition, IRL-1620 responses were not altered at sites treated with submaximal doses of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor or a prostaglandin synthase inhibitor. 6. ET-1 and IRL-1620 (100 fmol-1 pmol/site) did not induce oedema formation as measured by [125I]-albumin accumulation in the presence or absence of the vasodilator, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). ET-1 (1-3 pmol/site) inhibited substance P-induced oedema formation and this effect,suggested to be secondary to a vasoconstrictor effect, was significantly reversed by BQ-123 (1 nmol/site).7. The findings in this study indicate that there are ETA and ETB receptors in rat skin and agents which activate either receptor act to mediate a decrease in cutaneous blood flow, but have no effect on increased microvascular permeability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.