Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8546029›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica1995

Tuber and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis: an immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and immunoelectron and microscopic study.

T Hirose, B W Scheithauer, M B Lopes, H A Gerber, H J Altermatt, M J Hukee, S R VandenBerg, J C Charlesworth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Subependymal nodules and giant cell tumours in tuberous sclerosis complex patients: prevalence on MRI in relation to gene mutation.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Giant cells: contradiction to two-hit model of tuber formation?Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2007
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

T HiroseDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
B W Scheithauer
M B Lopes
H A Gerber
H J Altermatt
M J Hukee
S R VandenBerg
J C Charlesworth
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular nature of the giant eosinophilic cells of tuber and of the cells comprising subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) in tuberous sclerosis (TS) remains unclear. To assess the characteristics of these lesions, 13 tubers and 6 SEGA were immunohistochemically studied with glial and neuron-associated antigens. In addition to conventional ultrastructure, 6 tubers and 8 SEGA were subjected to immunoelectron microscopic study for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and somatostatin. Eosinophilic giant cells of tubers were positive for vimentin (100%), GFAP (77%) and S-100 protein (92%); such cells were also found to a various extent to be reactive for neuron-associated antigens, including neurofilament (NF) proteins (38%) or class III beta-tubulin (77%). SEGA also showed variable immunoreactivity for GFAP (50%) or for S-100 protein (100%); NF epitopes, class III beta-tubulin, and calbindin 28-kD were expressed in 2 (33%), 5 (83%) and 4 (67%) cases, respectively. Cytoplasmic staining for somatostatin (50%), met-enkephalin (50%), 5-hydroxytryptamine (33%), beta-endorphin (33%) and neuropeptide Y (17%) was noted in SEGA, but not in tubers. Ultrastructurally, the giant cells of tubers and the cells of SEGA contained numerous intermediate filaments, frequent lysosomes and occasional rectangular or rhomboid membrane-bound crystalloids exhibiting lamellar periodicity and structural transition to lysosomes. Some SEGA cells showed features suggestive of neuronal differentiation, including stacks of rough endoplasmic reticulum, occasional microtubules and a few dense-core granules. Furthermore, in one case of tuber, a process of a single large cell was seen to be engaged in synapse formation. Intermediate filaments within a few cells of both lesions were decorated by gold particle-labeled GFAP antiserum. Within the tumor cells of SEGA, irregular, non-membrane-bound, electron-lucent areas often contained somatostatin-immunoreactive particles, whereas the latter could not be detected in tuber. The present study provides further evidence of divergent glioneuronal differentiation, both in the giant cells of tubers and the cells of SEGA. The findings of similar cells at different sites, including the subependymal zone, white matter ("heterotopias"), and cortex indirectly supports the idea that these lesions of TS result from a migration abnormality.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain NeoplasmsCerebral CortexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGliomaHumansImmunohistochemistryInfantMaleMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronSomatostatinTuberous SclerosisGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID8546029
OpenAlexW2005981206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.