Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8540722›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1995

Distribution kinetics of enoxacin and its metabolite oxoenoxacin in excretory fluids of healthy volunteers.

U Jaehde, F Sörgel, K G Naber, J Zürcher, W Schunack

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U JaehdeInstitute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research, Nürnberg-Heroldsberg, Germany.
F Sörgel
K G Naber
J Zürcher
W Schunack
Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution kinetics of enoxacin and its main metabolite oxoenoxacin in excretory fluids was investigated in 11 healthy volunteers. A single intravenous dose of 428 mg of enoxacin was given as a 1-h infusion. Serial samples of plasma, urine, saliva, nasal secretions, tears, and sweat were drawn and analyzed for enoxacin and oxoenoxacin by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Large differences in the concentration-time profiles of the excretory fluids analyzed were observed. Nasal secretions exhibited the highest enoxacin exposure, as assessed by the area under the concentration-time curve. Excretory fluid/plasma area under the concentration-time curve ratios were found to be 1.67 +/- 0.36 for nasal secretions, 0.76 +/- 0.28 for saliva, 0.25 +/- 0.07 for sweat, and 0.23 +/- 0.11 for tears. The elimination half-life of enoxacin from sweat (8.27 +/- 2.63 h) was significantly longer than that for plasma (5.10 +/- 0.46 h). Oxoenoxacin was detected in urine and saliva and exhibited a higher renal clearance and a lower saliva exposure than the parent compound. In contrast to that of the metabolite, distribution of enoxacin in saliva was found to be time and pH dependent. In conclusion, our study revealed considerable differences in the distribution kinetics of enoxacin among various excretory sites. Because of distinct acidic and basic properties, the anionic oxometabolite significantly differs from the zwitterionic parent compound in its distribution characteristics.

Indexed as

AdultChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEnoxacinHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleNasal MucosaSalivaSweatTears4-oxo-enoxacinEnoxacin

Identifiers

PMID8540722
PMCPMC162887
OpenAlexW2060325860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.