Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8530879›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research1995

Selective mechanisms utilized by persistent and oncogenic viruses to interfere with antigen processing and presentation.

R Ehrlich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R EhrlichDepartment of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-mediated immunity is effective against cells harboring active virus replication, and is critical for the elimination of ongoing infections, regression of virus-associated tumors, and reducing or preventing the reactivation of persistent viruses. The capacity of persistent and oncogenic viruses to maintain a long-term relationship with their host presupposes viral mechanisms for circumventing antiviral defenses. By suppressing the expression of molecules associated with antigen processing and presentation, viruses abrogate the major immune mechanism that deals with the elimination of infected and tumor cells. This is accomplished either by transcriptional downregulation of genes encoding class I MHC antigens, peptide transporter molecules, and the proteasome-associated LMP subunits, or by interfering with transport of class I molecules to the cell surface. In some cases viruses shut off the expression of most viral proteins during latency or express mainly nonimmunogenic or antagonistic peptide epitopes. This review describes selective mechanisms utilized by viruses for interference with antigen processing and presentation, and addresses their significance for in vivo viral persistence and tumor progression.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansOncogenic VirusesTumor Virus InfectionsHistocompatibility Antigens Class I

Identifiers

PMID8530879
OpenAlexW2047089647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.