ReviewImmunologic research1995
Selective mechanisms utilized by persistent and oncogenic viruses to interfere with antigen processing and presentation.
Review in Immunologic research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The porcine antibody repertoire: variations on the textbook theme.Frontiers in immunology · 2012Article
- Poxvirus homologues of cellular genes.Virus genes · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-mediated immunity is effective against cells harboring active virus replication, and is critical for the elimination of ongoing infections, regression of virus-associated tumors, and reducing or preventing the reactivation of persistent viruses. The capacity of persistent and oncogenic viruses to maintain a long-term relationship with their host presupposes viral mechanisms for circumventing antiviral defenses. By suppressing the expression of molecules associated with antigen processing and presentation, viruses abrogate the major immune mechanism that deals with the elimination of infected and tumor cells. This is accomplished either by transcriptional downregulation of genes encoding class I MHC antigens, peptide transporter molecules, and the proteasome-associated LMP subunits, or by interfering with transport of class I molecules to the cell surface. In some cases viruses shut off the expression of most viral proteins during latency or express mainly nonimmunogenic or antagonistic peptide epitopes. This review describes selective mechanisms utilized by viruses for interference with antigen processing and presentation, and addresses their significance for in vivo viral persistence and tumor progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.