Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8529274›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics1995

RAD58 (XRS4)--a new gene in the RAD52 epistasis group.

O V Chepurnaya, S A Kozhin, V T Peshekhonov, V G Korolev

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

O V ChepurnayaDepartment of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Academy of Sciences of Russia, Gatchina, Russia.
S A Kozhin
V T Peshekhonov
V G Korolev

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RAD58 (XRS4) gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been previously identified as a DNA repair gene. In this communication, we show that RAD58 also encodes an essential meiotic function. The spore inviability of rad58 strains is not rescued by a spo13 mutation. The rad50 mutation suppresses spore inviability of a spo13 rad58 strain suggesting that RAD58 acts after RAD50 in meiotic recombination. The rad58-4 mutation does not prevent mitotic recombination events. Haploid rad58 cells fail to carry out G2-repair of gamma-induced lesions, whereas rad58/rad58 diploids are able to perform some diploid-specific repair of these lesions.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenes, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA DamageDNA, FungalDNA RepairFungal ProteinsGamma RaysGenetic Complementation TestMeiosisPlasmidsPloidiesRecombination, GeneticReproductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSPO13 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID8529274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.