Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8527667›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1995

Strain-dependent cross-bridge cycle for muscle.

D A Smith, M A Geeves

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D A SmithMax-Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.
M A Geeves
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology · DEMax Planck Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cross-bridge cycle for actin, S1 myosin, and nucleotides in solution is applied to the sliding filament model for fully activated striated muscle. The cycle has attached and rotated isomers of each actomyosin state. It is assumed that these forms have different zero-strain conformations with respect to the filament and that strain-free rate constants are the nominal solution values. Only one S1 unit of heavy meromyosin is considered. Transition-state theory is used to predict the strain dependences of S1 binding to actin, the force-generating transition to rotated states, and the release/binding of nucleotide and phosphate. We propose that ADP release and ATP binding are blocked by positive strain and phosphate release by negative strain. At large strains, rapid dissociation of S1 nucleotide from actin is expected when the compliant element of the cross-bridge is strained in either direction beyond its elastic limits. The dynamical behavior of this model of muscle contraction is discussed in general terms. Its computed steady-state properties are presented in an accompanying paper.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalActinsAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsBinding SitesBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsElasticityIn Vitro TechniquesIsometric ContractionLigandsMolecular StructureMuscle ContractionMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalActinsAdenosine TriphosphateLigandsMuscle ProteinsMyosin Subfragments

Identifiers

PMID8527667
PMCPMC1236278
OpenAlexW2060959865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.