Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8526480›Full record

ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek1995

Nutritional physiology of type isolates of currently accepted species of Exophiala and Phaeococcomyces.

G S de Hoog, A H Gerritis van den Ende, J M Uijthof, W A Untereiner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diversity of Rock-Inhabiting Fungi in Tarragona Province, Spain.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. MycoKeys · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exophiala oligosperma causing olecranon bursitis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Developments in fungal taxonomy.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1999
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G S de HoogCentraalburau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands.
A H Gerritis van den Ende
J M Uijthof
W A Untereiner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional physiological and tolerance tests were performed for all type strains of species currently classified in the black yeast genera Exophiala and Phaeococcomyces, including some additional type strains of taxa recently reidentified as Exophiala species. Most described Exophiala species can be distinguished by physiological characters. Exophiala jeanselmei with its varieties, and E. castellanii should all be retained as separate taxa. The pairs of strains Mycotorula schawii/Exophiala dermatitidis, Hormodendrum negronii/Exophiala jeanselmei var. lecaniicorni and Sporotrichum gougerotii/Torulabergeri were found to be conspecific. Phenetic analyses of physiological data support the identity of Phaeococcomyces exophialae as a yeast-like synanamorph of Exophiala spinifera. The taxonomic positions of the genera Nadsoniella, Phaeoannellomyces and Wangiella are discussed. The genera Exophiala and Phaeococcomyces are unrelated.

Indexed as

ExophialaMitosporic FungiPhylogenySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID8526480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.