Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8524849›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1995

Arabidopsis mutants deficient in T-DNA integration.

R V Sonti, M Chiurazzi, D Wong, C S Davies, G R Harlow, D W Mount, E R Signer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. ImprovingGenes · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Kin Recognition in the Parasitic PlantFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  6. Biodesign research · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transgene silencing in monocots.Plant molecular biology · 2000
    Review
  19. Transgenic DNA integrated into the oat genome is frequently interspersed by host DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R V SontiDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.
M Chiurazzi
D Wong
C S Davies
G R Harlow
D W Mount
E R Signer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arabidopsis thaliana mutants originally isolated as hypersensitive to irradiation were screened for the ability to be transformed by Agrobacterium transferred DNA (T-DNA). One of four UV-hypersensitive mutants and one of two gamma-hypersensitive mutants tested showed a significant reduction in the frequency of stable transformants compared with radioresistant controls. In a transient assay for T-DNA transfer independent of genomic integration, both mutant lines took up and expressed T-DNA as efficiently as parental lines. These lines are therefore deficient specifically in stable T-DNA integration and thus provide direct evidence for the role of a plant function in that process. As radiation hypersensitivity suggests a deficiency in repair of DNA damage, that plant function may be one that is also involved in DNA repair, possibly, from other evidence, in repair of double-strand DNA breaks.

Indexed as

DNA RepairMutationTransformation, GeneticAgrobacterium tumefaciensArabidopsisCulture TechniquesDNA, BacterialPlant RootsPlant ShootsRadiation ToleranceUltraviolet RaysDNA, BacterialT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID8524849
PMCPMC40487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.