Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8524780›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1995

Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution.

C W Birky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 324 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
324citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

324 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measuring maternal line selection driven by differential survival in ex situ collections for plant conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2026
    Article
  19. Structural divergence and molecular adaptation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  20. The first complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article

264 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C W BirkyDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nearly all eukaryotes, at least some individuals inherit mitochondrial and chloroplast genes from only one parent. There is no single mechanism of uniparental inheritance: organelle gene inheritance is blocked by a variety of mechanisms and at different stages of reproduction in different species. Frequent changes in the pattern of organelle gene inheritance during evolution suggest that it is subject to varying selective pressures. Organelle genes often fail to recombine even when inherited biparentally; consequently, their inheritance is asexual. Sexual reproduction is apparently less important for genes in organelles than for nuclear genes, probably because there are fewer of them. As a result organelle sex can be lost because of selection for special reproductive features such as oogamy or because uniparental inheritance reduces the spread of cytoplasmic parasites and selfish organelle DNA.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionExtrachromosomal InheritanceAnimalsChloroplastsEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsFungiMitochondriaModels, GeneticPlants

Identifiers

PMID8524780
PMCPMC40394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.