ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1995
Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrinsic promoter responsiveness dictates sensitivity to transcriptional activation by enhancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Semantics and Mechanisms of Enhancers and Promoters: "What Is True forAnnual review of biochemistry · 2026Review
- Non-canonical functions of enhancers: regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription, DNA replication, and V(D)J recombination.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2024Article
- Article
- Functional analysis of a random-sequence chromosome reveals a high level and the molecular nature of transcriptional noise in yeast cells.Molecular cell · 2023Article
- Comparison of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II across eukaryotic species.eLife · 2021Article
- Review
- Promoter-specific dynamics of TATA-binding protein association with the human genome.Genome research · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Core promoter-specific gene regulation: TATA box selectivity and Initiator-dependent bi-directionality of serum response factor-activated transcription.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Article
- Mediator is an intrinsic component of the basal RNA polymerase II machinery in vivo.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Cloning, molecular characterization, and mRNA expression of the thermostable family 3 β-glucosidase from the rare fungus Stachybotrys microspora.Molecular biotechnology · 2013Article
- Review
- Highly redundant function of multiple AT-rich sequences as core promoter elements in the TATA-less RPS5 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Three novel downstream promoter elements regulate MHC class I promoter activity in mammalian cells.PloS one · 2010Article
- Promoter architecture and the evolvability of gene expression.Journal of biology · 2009Review
- Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2008Article
- Analysis of transcriptional activation at a distance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Molecular and cellular biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The yeast his3 promoter region contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that are differentially utilized in constitutive his3 transcription and Gcn4-activated his3 transcription. TR contains the canonical TATAAA sequence, whereas TC is an extended region that lacks a conventional TATA sequence and does not support transcription in vitro. Surprisingly, differential his3 TATA-element utilization does not depend on specific properties of activator proteins but, rather, is determined by the overall level of his3 transcription. At low levels of transcription, the upstream TC is preferentially utilized, even though it is inherently a much weaker TATA element than TR. The TATA elements are utilized equally at intermediate levels, whereas TR is strongly preferred at high levels of transcription. This characteristic behavior can be recreated by replacing TC with moderately functional derivatives of a conventional TATA element, suggesting that TC is a collection of weak TATA elements. Analysis of promoters containing two biochemically defined TATA elements indicates that differential utilization occurs when the upstream TATA element is weaker than the downstream element. In other situations, the upstream TATA element is preferentially utilized in a manner that is independent of the overall level of transcription. Thus, in promoters containing multiple TATA elements, relative utilization not only depends on the quality and arrangement of the TATA elements but can vary with the overall level of transcriptional stimulation. We suggest that differential TATA utilization results from the combination of an intrinsic preference for the upstream element and functional saturation of weak TATA elements at low levels of transcriptional stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.